Opioid prescribing practices and patient-requested refill patterns following laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.

PURPOSE: Excessive post-operative opioid prescribing has led to efforts to match prescriptions with patient need after surgery. We investigated opioid prescribing practices, rate of patient-requested opioid refills, and associated factors after laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR). METHODS: LIHRs at a single institution from 3/2019 to 3/2021 were queried from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative for demographics, perioperative details, and patient-reported opioid usage. Opioid prescriptions at discharge and opioid refills were extracted from the medical record. Univariate and multivariable regression were used to identify factors associated with opioid refills within 30-days of surgery. RESULTS: Four hundred and ninety LIHR patients were analyzed. The median number of opioid tablets prescribed was 12 [interquartile range (IQR) 10-15], and 4% requested a refill. On univariate analysis, patients who requested refills were younger [55 years (IQR 37-61) vs. 62 years (IQR 36.8-61), p = 0.012], more likely to have undergone transabdominal preperitoneal repair (75% vs. 26.4%, p < 0.001), have a scrotal component (30% vs. 11%, p = 0.022), and have permanent tacks used (80% vs. 49.4%, p = 0.014). There was a 12% increase in the odds of opioid refill for every 1 tablet of oxycodone prescribed at discharge (95% CI for OR 1.04-1.21, p = 0.003) after controlling for age and surgery type. Patient-reported opioid use was available for 289 (59%) patients. Post-operatively, 67% of patients used ≤ 4 opioid tablets, and 87% used no more than 10 opioid tablets. CONCLUSION: Most patients use fewer opioid tablets than prescribed. Requests for opioid refills are rare following LIHR (4%) and associated with higher opioid prescribing.

Comparing rates of bowel injury for laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair: a retrospective analysis of the abdominal core health quality collaborative.

PURPOSE: Bowel injury during laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair is a rare but potentially serious complication. We sought to compare bowel injury rates during minimally invasive approaches to ventral hernia repair using a national hernia registry. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair (including cases converted-to-open) between 2013 and 2021 were retrospectively identified in the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative registry. The primary outcome was bowel injury, which included partial- and full-thickness injuries and re-operations for missed enterotomies. Statistical analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Overall, 10,660 patients were included (4116 laparoscopic, 6544 robotic). The laparoscopic group included more incisional hernias (68% vs 62%, p < 0.001) and similar rates of recurrent hernias (23% vs 22%, p = 0.26). A total of 109 bowel injuries were identified, with more occurring in the laparoscopic group (55 [1.3%] laparoscopic vs. 54 [0.8%] robotic; p = 0.01). Specifically, there were more full-thickness and missed enterotomies in the laparoscopic group (29 laparoscopic vs. 20 robotic; p = 0.012). Bowel injury resulted in higher rates of wound morbidity and major post-operative complications including sepsis, re-admission, and re-operation. Following adjustment for recurrent and incisional hernias, prior mesh, patient age, and hernia width, bowel injury during laparoscopic repair remained significantly more likely than bowel injury during robotic repair (OR 1.669 [95% C.I.: 1.141-2.440]; p = 0.008). CONCLUSION: In a large registry, laparoscopic ventral hernia repair is associated with an increased risk of bowel injury compared to repairs utilizing the robotic platform. Knowing the limitations of retrospective research, large national registries are well suited to explore rare outcomes which cannot be feasibly assessed with randomized controlled trials.